What matters in Tatenberg
Property valuation: preparation for the specific location and property.
Which feature actually belongs to the property?
Record viewing direction, boundaries and usable access to the water. Consider special installations or rights only with their supporting basis. A broadly described waterside comparable may be unsuitable if its rights or plot arrangement differ substantially.
Limited comparables need explicit assumptions
Where directly comparable properties are scarce, explain the selection of valuation evidence. Condition, maintenance requirements and private outdoor space also belong in the assessment. The relationship with water should not obscure those features. A traceable pricing strategy identifies established information and matters requiring additional professional examination.
Treat an uncertain feature as a separate scenario
If allocation of a water-related use remains unresolved, its significance should not disappear inside the valuation. First establish the evidenced basis on which the property can be assessed. A supplementary scenario including the desired feature must be expressly conditional. You can then identify which clarification would help before deciding a final price, rather than immediately assigning certain value to an unverified advantage.
Sort comparison evidence by outlook and actual use
Create a feature schedule for possible comparables: evidenced view, accessible outdoor space, building condition and documented special use. Mark missing information. An attractive waterside photograph cannot fill these fields by itself. With few suitable cases, explain differences and limitations rather than replace information gaps with a blanket Tatenberg location factor that suggests more certainty than the evidence provides.